| |
Home > Abstracts
ABSTRACTS
Re-imagining
Culture in the Russo-Japanese War
Birkbeck College, University of London,
27 March 2004
Patriotism and Despondency: Japanese Society
at War, 1904-5
Dr Naoko Shimazu, Birkbeck College, University of London
The Russo-Japanese War in Russian Cultural
Consciousness
Dr Rosamund Bartlett, University of Durham
Japanese Literary Responses to the Russo-Japanese
War
Dr Steve Dodd, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of
London
Gods, Numbers, and the War: Tsushima
Images in the Works of Velimir Khlebnikov
Professor Ikuo Kameyama, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
Consuming Nationalism: Patriotic Objects
of Desire during the Russo-Japanese War
Dr Yuko Kikuchi, Chelsea College
of Art & Design - The London Institute
Looking for Poland in Japan: Polish art world
responses to the Russo-Japanese War
Dr David Crowley, Royal College of Art
Russian Ideologies of Empire and the Origins
of the War with Japan
Dr David Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, Brock University
Patriotism and
Despondency: Japanese Society at War, 1904-5
Dr Naoko Shimazu, Birkbeck College, University of London
How did the Japanese public respond to the outbreak of the war in 1904?
The imminent prospect of a war against Russia ignited a fierce domestic
debate, splitting the country into pro-war and anti-war factions. As in
any society at war, Japanese society similarly revealed an uneasy mixture
of conflicting emotions. On the one hand, the Japanese felt proud and patriotic
as an Asian nation fighting against a European enemy. Victories were celebrated
in almost every municipality throughout Japan by lantern parades, which
became a regular feature of life in wartime Japan. On the other hand, however,
the enormous socio-economic costs of the war placed an intolerable burden
on the lives of people, particularly the poor, whose principal breadwinners
were sent to death on battlefield. The war in Japan concluded with the outbreak
of civil disorder in the Hibiya Riots of September 1905, when the war-weary
people vented their anger at the ‘unfair’ peace terms of the
Treaty of Portsmouth. Whilst providing a chronological backdrop to the war,
this paper attempts to offer a glimpse of how Japanese people lived through
the war.
Back to top
The Russo-Japanese War in Russian
Cultural Consciousness
Dr Rosamund Bartlett, University of Durham
Few people in Russia expected war to break out with Japan in 1904, and
even fewer understood why there should be military hostilities in such
a remote part of their empire. Nevertheless, the surprise midnight attack
on the Russian naval squadron in Port Arthur unleashed a torrent of patriotic
feeling against Japan. Right-wing newspapers vilified Asian perfidy and
noisy demonstrations were held in all major cities. Loyal subjects took
to the streets with portraits of the Tsar, and audiences in theatres
all
over Russia demanded that the national anthem be played. At a performance
of Rigoletto at the Bolshoi Theatre in Moscow during Shrovetide, for
example, the national anthem was played as many as three times by popular
consent
even before the curtain was raised, and a further three times before
the commencement of the final act.
The Russo-Japanese War indeed made a huge impact on Russian society. Placing
the conflict in the context of Russia's aggressive colonialist expansion
in the Far East in the late 19th century, this paper will examine some of
the
ways in which the war manifested itself in the nation's cultural consciousness – from
the dying Chekhov's quixotic plan to serve as a doctor on the front, to the
venerable Tolstoy's typically outspoken castigation of the havoc and carnage
caused by the "cancer of imperialism".
Back to top
Japanese Literary Responses to the
Russo-Japanese War
Dr Steve Dodd, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of
London
Japanese writers responded to the Russo-Japanese war in a variety of
ways. Some, like Mori Ogai and Tayama Katai, actually visited the battle
arena and wrote pieces based on their experiences there. Others, like
Yosano Akiko, responded from a distance and appeared to shed a critical
gaze on the war itself. Some writers such as Shimazaki Tôson and
Futabatei Shimei had no direct experience of the war but viewed the conflict
as a positive sign of Japan’s emergence as a modern state able
to stand equal to western powers. Notwithstanding the variety of responses,
the war can be said to have had a profound influence in creating, to
borrow Raymond Williams’ memorable phrase, a new “structure
of feeling” for the entire next generation of Japanese writers.
I will set out some of the main literary responses to the war among Japanese
writers of the time, and attempt to show how this conflict helped produce
a more self-reflective, inward-looking tendency among writers that prefigured
the overall mood of the following Taisho period.
Back to top
Gods, Numbers, and the War: Tsushima Images
in the Works of Velimir Khlebnikov
Professor Ikuo Kameyama, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
In this paper, I focus on the changes in the images and meanings of
the Russo-Japanese War as expressed in the poetry of Velimir Khlebnikov,
and discuss the Russian Futurists’ view of Asia observed in his
works through its comparison with those of the contemporary Russian poets
and writers belonging to other schools of thought. As is widely recognised,
Russo-Japanese War had an enormous influence on Russian writers and poets
such as Tolstoi, Andreev, Bryusov, Blok and V.Ivanov. Such writers, each
with their diverse cultural backgrounds and world views ranging from
Realism to Symbolism, are known to have shown their reactions to the
war in their own individual ways. Yet the impact that the war had on
the Russian Avant-garde movement had scarcely been discussed because
there had been an emphasis on the Symbolist movement or on the eschatological
climate, causing the emergence of such a movement at the time. But in
fact, the Russo-Japanese War, especially Russia’s loss at Tsushima
affected the contemporary Russian Avant-garde artists to the extent that
it eventually caused the drastic move from Symbolism to Futurism. In
1914, when the Italian Futurist Marinetti visited Russia, Khlebnikov
declared the independence of the Russian Futurism by writing to Marinetti, ‘We
had plunged into the Future in 1905,’ and emphasized its own historical
precedence. But such a view held by Khlebnikov gradually evolved towards
solidarity with Asia with an increasing anti-Western orientation. In
the paper I attempt to uncover the process whereby such change takes
place by observing the following three developments in Khlebnikov's works:
1) Khlebnikov's "Tsushima experience"(1905); 2) "Law of
time"(1912); and 3) "A letter to two Japanese" (1916).
Back to top
Consuming Nationalism: Patriotic Objects of
Desire during the Russo-Japanese War
Dr Yuko Kikuchi, Chelsea
College of Art & Design - The London Institute
The Russo-Japanese War was one of the first successful
modern wars in terms of the public dissemination of information, alongside
the commodification
and consumption of nationalism. The modern technology of print media -
including magazines, political cartoons, picture prints, photographs
as well as
postcards (which boosted an unprecedented ‘postcard boom’)
- disseminated war information and were consumed by a wide-range of people.
Young boys
were dressed in Navy sailor uniforms with trumpets in their hands enjoying
modern tin toys of battleships as well as various picture books depicting
the war. Daily objects and war memorabilia such as mass-produced glass
and pottery objects idolized war heroes and popularised war events. The
patriotic mood was reflected also by the styles, patterns and colours
of contemporary lady’s fashion. The genroku moy (genroku pattern),
a traditional design was revived as symbolising power and speed, and
the hairstyle nicknamed ‘203 metre hill’ through its association
with a famous battle became popular for women ranging from geisha to
high school girls. The Mitsukoshi department store in Tokyo was instrumental
in creating cutting-edge war fashion as part of urban culture. This paper
intends to show the popular experience of the war through the objects
of desire. Back to top
Looking for Poland in Japan: Polish art world
responses to the Russo-Japanese War
Dr David Crowley, Royal College of Art
When, in the early years of the twentieth-century, Russia and Japan
moved towards war, Polish hopes were raised that the brother ‘David’ would
fatally wound the Russian Goliath. Living under imperial rule and subject
to vigorous campaigns of Russification, nationalist Poles took the view
that the enemy’s enemy should become their friend. Missions were
dispatched to Tokyo to secure support for the struggle to shake Poland
free of the Romanovs. Unsuccessful, these initiatives might seem little
more than a footnote in the history of diplomacy and conflict. However,
the distant thunder of the war off Port Arthur and the Tsushima Strait,
was keenly heard in Polish culture. For Polish society – deprived
of sovereign political institutions – culture was politics. Paintings,
buildings and poems were judged according to a vigorously maintained
national index. It is not surprising then that ‘Japonisme’ --
a pan-European fashion – carried a particular political charge
in this particular context. As this paper will show, prominent artists,
collectors and writers, used symbols of Japan to comment on the state
of Poland. In Krakow, Feliks ‘Mangha’ Jasienski walked in
the city in the armour of a samurai warrior and a local monument to Polish
insurgency was represented by Stanislaw Wyspianski in a famous drawing
cycle as Mount Fuji. The insistent and in many ways eclectic orientalism
of Polish culture under Russian rule appears to stretch the connections
drawn by Said and others between orientalism and empire. According to
her Polish devotees, the source of Japan’s power of resistance
lay not in her imperial social order but in her desirable alterity. Back to top
Russian Ideologies of Empire and the Origins
of the War with Japan
Dr David Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, Brock University
My paper will examine the principal ideologies that drove Russian expansion
in East Asia in the decade before the outbreak of the war with Japan
in 1904. I will focus on the four individuals whose ideas strongly influenced
tsarist policy on the Pacific during the first decade of Nicholas II’s
reign: Finance Minister Sergei Witte, War Minister Aleksei Kuropatkin,
the explorer Nikolai Przhevalskii, and the poet and newspaper publisher
Prince Esper Ukhtomskii. I will argue that Russian diplomacy in East
Asia at the time was highly erratic and confused in part because of these
four competing visions of empire in the Orient.
Back
to top
Home | Programme |
Abstracts
| |