Professor Adam Gearey
Is there an alternative to debt and privatised education? Does a law school do any more than produce skilled operatives to grease the wheels of capital? This first panel of 2013’s Law on Trial intends to ask some critical questions about the perilous state of British Universities and the possibility of imagining alternatives. To what extent can a Law School address the wider community and its legal needs? Is a university simply a business turning a profit from its human capital? How can thinking about law be made part of an education in politics or ‘critical’ humanities? Equally important is the history of thinking differently about education- from the Anti-University of London, to the student protests of the 1960s and the Occupied spaces of present day. If the task of the utopian or critical law school is more than its own survival – how can these traditions of hope and dissent make any sense to us now?
Professor Bill Bowring with:
Natalie Csengeri: caseworker at Lloyds PR Solicitors, 2012 KCL LLM Labour Law with a Distinction, 2011 BPTC City University, 2009 University of California Santa Barbara Political Science
Stephen Knight: currently doing a pupillage, 2012 UCL LLM Jurisprudence and Legal Theory with a Distinction, 2011 BPTC City University London, 2009 University of Sheffield, 2008 University of Strasbourg.
Natalie and Stephen are both young lawyers in their 20s and committed political activists: they are active members of the Executive Committee of the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers
They will each reflect on their recent experiences of legal education, from a socialist point of view.
Professor Patricia Tuitt and Dr Stewart Motha
What should the 21st century law student be required to study? In a field of legal services in which entities as diverse as Law Centres and Supermarkets play a part, which professional or other bodies should determine the qualification regulations of aspiring lawyers? Should legal academics seek to impart broad principles of law or detailed rules and procedures? As it examines the merits of Birkbeck School of Law's alternative qualifying law degree, our distinguished panel will debate the foundations of legal knowledge and many other questions concerning the academic stage of legal training.
Confirmed panel members:
Chaired by Professor Matthew Weait
At a time when access to the legal profession is harder than ever for those who meet the formal conditions for training, this session will explore barriers to entry.
Lisa Webley, Professor of Empirical Legal Studies at the University of Westminster, will deliver a talk entitled Cultural Capital, the Legal Profession and Indirect Discrimination. Drawing on data derived from a series of socio-legal empirical projects focused on the workings of the legal profession, the talk will provide some context on the changing demography of the legal profession(s). It will consider the legal profession's use of proxies (markers of cultural capital) for hiring and promotion with reference to Bourdieu’s theory of human capital, and set out how those proxies and processes may lead to unintended consequences including indirect discrimination against Black Asian and Minority Ethnic and women (would-be) lawyers. However, it also posits that some of the challenges and opportunities that the legal profession(s) face in the near future, including alternative business structures, may begin to subvert the operation of those proxies.
There will be a response to Professor Webley's talk from Amber Moore. Ms Moore is a Learning and Development specialist with extensive experience of designing, developing and delivering training solutions across global, multi-disciplinary, complex organisations. She has held the most senior training and development roles in several large organisations including two of the top ten international legal practices in the UK. Her expertise has been recognised by over a dozen major awards within her field, gained through her work at DLA Piper LLP and Ashurst LLP.
Ms Moore is a member of the Joint Academic Stage Board for the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Bar Standards Board and a Fellow of the Institute of Continuing Professional Development.
The talk will be a provocative intervention, and there will be formal responses to it from law students aspiring to enter the profession. There will also be plenty of opportunity for questions from the audience.
Dr Oscar Guardiola-Rivera
Join UN Member of the Working Group on People of African Descent, Mireille Fanon-Mendes France, world-renowned legal sociologist Boaventura de Sousa Santos, and philosopher Lewis R. Gordon - according to David Horowitz one of the 101 most dangerous academics in America - for a conversation on the future of human rights, law and legal education in the twenty-first century. Against a background of budget cuts, austerity and the criminalization of protest, these three notable speakers and political activists will consider whether we can still dream new and alternative realities for law and education in a climate where publicly funded and privately sourced providers battle with high fees and the ever expanding rules of profit and market competition. Professor de Sousa Santos will present the World Social Forums initiative for a University of the Popular Movements. Mireille Fanon will speak from her experience in the office of the UN Human Rights Commission and the testimonies gathered by the UN team she led while to study the impact of UK cuts on peoples of African descent, all the while reaffirming the legacy of her father, the 1960s famous thinker and activist Frantz Fanon. Professor Gordon will consider academic disciplinary decadence and prospects for transformation from the perspective of his engagement with existential and Fanonian philosophy as well as activism. We may even have a few surprises involving drums and poetry to make this Friday session one to remember!